Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kristof Schoenaerts's avatar

This advice is problematic because it focuses on surface-level improvements rather than addressing the core purpose of LinkedIn for job seekers: being discoverable in recruiter searches. Here’s why it falls short:

1. Misplaced Emphasis on Visuals:

While a professional photo can enhance profile views, recruiters don’t prioritize appearance. Their primary concern is finding candidates who match specific criteria, which relies on keyword optimization, not visuals.

2. Generic Profile Elements:

The advice about crafting a headline and summary is overly focused on storytelling and “shining,” rather than ensuring these sections are keyword-rich. A headline like “Helping You Grow in Tech” might sound appealing but lacks the specificity that LinkedIn’s search algorithm needs to rank your profile for relevant roles.

3. No Focus on LinkedIn as a Database:

LinkedIn operates as a search tool for recruiters. The advice does not emphasize the importance of using industry-specific keywords in all profile sections (headline, experience, skills) to ensure recruiters find you in searches.

4. Networking Advice is Vague:

Encouraging connections is fine, but it doesn’t explain how strategic networking—connecting with recruiters or decision-makers in your industry—can boost your visibility in the right circles.

5. Achievements Without Optimization:

Highlighting quantifiable achievements is useful, but without integrating relevant keywords, these achievements won’t improve your search visibility.

Ultimately, the advice focuses too much on making the profile look good to human readers, ignoring that the real audience is LinkedIn’s search algorithm. Without keyword optimization and a database-centric approach, job seekers risk being invisible to recruiters.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts